AI Ecosystem To Build Solutions

Keep using it. A coding agent writes code well. What it cannot do is decide what the code should do, or check that it did. Orwin writes the spec, writes the tests from your rules, and reviews every change against the story it claims to implement.

Because an agent builds whatever it is pointed at. When the intent lives in a chat window, the code drifts from it by the second week. A written spec the agent reads keeps a hundred fast changes pointed at one goal, and it stays with you when the project ends.

From the rules you approved, not from the code. A test written after the code tests what was built; a test written from the rule tests what was asked. Orwin writes them before the code exists, so a wrong answer cannot pass its own exam.

Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code and OpenAI Codex, and anything else that speaks MCP: the agent reads the story, its criteria and its tests from inside your editor and writes the result back to the board. Pull requests are reviewed on GitHub.

No. Orwin asks the questions a product manager would, one at a time, with its recommended answer; writes the documents; and writes the tests from the rules you approve, before the code exists.

Yes. Connect the repository and Orwin reads it: a story that names a file is checked against what is really there, and after you ship, the plan is kept true to the code, so the next project starts from what exists.

By the seat, not by the hour: a free plan for one project, Pro at $15 a seat a month, Team at $25. Clients join as viewers for free on every plan.

Orwin is in private pilot. Leave your email and we reach out as spots open; every button on the site joins the same list, and nothing is charged.